> Using an "--atoq-*" prefix for all options associated with > the adaptive auto-leveling unifies these switches while clearly > distinguishing them from other options such as "--athlower" or > "--athtype" that tune the absolute level of the ATH.
And what about an eth prefix? I know some will argue that it's not a very scientific term, but the notion we introduced really looks like an effective threshold of hearing. > the "--adapt-thres-*" switches. The option "--ath-adjust" has > been around longer, so I will await approval from interested > developers before so boldly changing the name on that. =) Change the name if you want (although I'd prefer --eth-xxx). As it's considered to be experimental switches, it's not part of the doc, and so (theorically) end users should not be used to it. > Meanwhile, I hope to check out the power-law model patch (that > Alexander posted on Lame-dev) sometime in the next week or two. Btw, I hope this patch is for 3.91 only and not 3.90, as I'd really like to see a 3.90 release soon (ie a maximum delay of a few weeks, not a few months) _______________________________________________ mp3encoder mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/mp3encoder
