"Ben Bucksch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Yes, it's especially important considering how these email worms, which > are "popular" these days, work. > > Note that we probably know a human-language name for the type. Both the > Help Applications in Mozilla and the Windows file type registry support > "description"s or similar. No need to show the raw mimetype name, in > most cases. True, although raw MIME types should probably be used in case there isn't a description.
- Visibility of attachments Ben Bucksch
- Re: Visibility of attachments Mike Macgirvin
- Re: Visibility of attachments Daniel Bratell
- Re: Visibility of attachments Garth Wallace
- Re: Visibility of attachments Ben Bucksch
- Re: Visibility of attachments Garth Wallace
- Re: Visibility of attachments Ben Ruppel
- Re: Visibility of attachments Ben Bucksch
- Re: Visibility of attachments Jennifer Glick
- Re: Visibility of attachments Daniel Bratell
- Re: Visibility of attachments John Gardiner Myers
- Re: Visibility of attachments Ben Bucksch
- Re: Visibility of attachments Henrik Gemal
- Re: Visibility of attachments Peter Lairo
- Re: Visibility of attachments Ben Bucksch
- Re: Visibility of attachments Carl Parrish