"Daniel Bratell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > If we are going to have them at the end I think a table with icon, > name/link, type and size would be both informative and easy to use. > Maybe the type (I was thinking MIME type) would be a little too technical. It may be technical, but it's also informative and useful. It would help identify what you may be messing with if you open the attachment.
- Visibility of attachments Ben Bucksch
- Re: Visibility of attachments Mike Macgirvin
- Re: Visibility of attachments Daniel Bratell
- Re: Visibility of attachments Garth Wallace
- Re: Visibility of attachments Ben Bucksch
- Re: Visibility of attachments Garth Wallace
- Re: Visibility of attachments Ben Ruppel
- Re: Visibility of attachments Ben Bucksch
- Re: Visibility of attachments Jennifer Glick
- Re: Visibility of attachments Daniel Bratell
- Re: Visibility of attachments John Gardiner Myers
- Re: Visibility of attachments Ben Bucksch
- Re: Visibility of attachments Henrik Gemal
- Re: Visibility of attachments Peter Lairo