Way too easy. I've ended up deleting msgs that seemed to have no
intrinsic value only to be told later that they contained important
attachmments that would now have to be resent.
> Thinking about 4.x, a solution seems easy: Just put a note at the
> end of the body, that there are attachments, in they aren't all
> inline. Or, imitate 4.x completely and add links for each of the
> non-inline attachments. Shouldn't be hard and completely solves the
> problem.
The first solution is just a tease. Yeah, you've got attachments but
we're not going to tell you how to see them, or what type they are. And
of course, why would you want to ever know something like how big they are?
Add the links.
