The MonoGame project is set to be an application instead of a library? Interesting. I'll check that out when I get home. Thanks for the tip.
Sly On 18 May 2012 09:49, Jonathan Pobst <mon...@jpobst.com> wrote: > You might want to look at what I wrote here: > > https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/**show_bug.cgi?id=5146<https://bugzilla.xamarin.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5146> > > If it's the same issue, I don't think it has anything to do with implicit > references. > > Jonathan > > > > On 5/17/2012 5:36 PM, Konaju Games (Dev) wrote: > >> Seeing the other threads about this linking issue, and your decision to >> exercise your disclaimer clause to now be in favour of implicit linking, >> could we expect an update for MfA to go back to implicit linking? This >> linker issue is a blocker for my work on MonoGame as even adding the >> reference to Lidgren to my startup project doesn't fix the linker error. >> >> Sly >> >> On 18 May 2012 01:24, Jonathan Pryor <j...@xamarin.com >> <mailto:j...@xamarin.com>> wrote: >> >> On May 17, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Konaju Games (Dev) wrote: >> > >> We don't implicitly include additional assemblies. >> > We have never had to explicitly reference the >> Lidgren.Network.Android project from our startup project before. Is >> that a new requirement in MfA 4.2? >> >> I had thought that we always had this requirement, and Visual Studio >> has frequently enforced this requirement. I don't know why things >> have changed in 4.2. :-/ >> >> Doubly odd is that .apk inclusion apparently will include implicitly >> referenced assemblies (based on other mailing list threads), while >> fast deployment won't. >> >> Be that as it may, I'm currently of the opinion [0] that assemblies >> should be explicitly referenced, as it's less "magical" and ensures >> that the App developer knows which assemblies will be included (and >> thus have some sort of guide for how big the resulting app will be). >> Implicitly pulling things in could make things harder, as you start >> wondering why assembly X is being stored in your app... >> >> - Jon >> >> [0] Subject to change without notice, additional experience, and/or >> (in)sanity. >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Monodroid mailing list >> Monodroid@lists.ximian.com >> <mailto:Monodroid@lists.**ximian.com<Monodroid@lists.ximian.com> >> > >> >> >> UNSUBSCRIBE INFORMATION: >> >> http://lists.ximian.com/**mailman/listinfo/monodroid<http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodroid> >> >> >> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Monodroid mailing list >> Monodroid@lists.ximian.com >> >> UNSUBSCRIBE INFORMATION: >> http://lists.ximian.com/**mailman/listinfo/monodroid<http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodroid> >> > > >
_______________________________________________ Monodroid mailing list Monodroid@lists.ximian.com UNSUBSCRIBE INFORMATION: http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodroid
