On May 17, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Konaju Games (Dev) wrote: > >> We don't implicitly include additional assemblies. > We have never had to explicitly reference the Lidgren.Network.Android project > from our startup project before. Is that a new requirement in MfA 4.2?
I had thought that we always had this requirement, and Visual Studio has frequently enforced this requirement. I don't know why things have changed in 4.2. :-/ Doubly odd is that .apk inclusion apparently will include implicitly referenced assemblies (based on other mailing list threads), while fast deployment won't. Be that as it may, I'm currently of the opinion [0] that assemblies should be explicitly referenced, as it's less "magical" and ensures that the App developer knows which assemblies will be included (and thus have some sort of guide for how big the resulting app will be). Implicitly pulling things in could make things harder, as you start wondering why assembly X is being stored in your app... - Jon [0] Subject to change without notice, additional experience, and/or (in)sanity. _______________________________________________ Monodroid mailing list Monodroid@lists.ximian.com UNSUBSCRIBE INFORMATION: http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/monodroid
