On Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 08:11:04AM +0100, Mark Overmeer wrote: > > Personally, the name 'Pod::OO' sounds much more encouraging for other > > module authors to try on (since it implies that it is compatible with > > the POD syntax). > > That's one good point for POD::OO. That's probably the reason that C++ > is named that way: to hide the huge step they where actually making away > from C. It may work better from a sales point of view, in the beginning, > but outsiders always ask: "you are a C programmer, can you debug my C++ > program?".
Ah, but by now, the huge impact implied by the name "::OO" should be quite well understood by anybody not living in caves for the past decade. And, I'd like to know, can a POD author debug an OODoc document? :) Thanks, /Autrijus/
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
