On 25 Jun 2003 23:19:28 +0200 Ronald Bultje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's much more likely to be related to the somewhat non-optimal > audio recording implementation in lavrec. It's not perfect, but > mostly works. You'd need a threaded approach (being used already) > where the audio input streamoff and video capture rate are not > actually inter-related(this part is missing) to fix this. lavrec > doesn't allow for this (yet). A while ago I toyed with the idea of trying to replace lavrec's audio code with portaudio, which is what audacity uses. It is probably a bit more than I can handle but was I on the right track? Martin ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
