On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 17:19, Ronald Bultje wrote: > > The ***video*** driver/hardware is in no single way responsible for > anything that is even remotely related to ***audio***. At best, > interaction between the two (and thus at application-level, not at > hardware/driver level) is an issue.
Well, interaction, in as much as I think a bad picture can hog the hardware too long compressing the frame. > It's much more likely to be related to the somewhat non-optimal audio > recording implementation in lavrec. It's not perfect, but mostly works. Right, except for corner cases, at least in the G400 marvel case. > You'd need a threaded approach (being used already) where the audio > input streamoff and video capture rate are not actually inter-related > (this part is missing) to fix this. lavrec doesn't allow for this (yet). ETA? Or, rather, is gstreamer up to the task of replacing lavrec yet? b. -- Brian J. Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
