On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 06:20:44PM -0800, Trent Piepho wrote: > On Mon, 30 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > At the difference in space usage, disk. I have a 5:27s clip here > > that I was testing with. It is 720x480, default lavrec jpeg quality > > (50% I think it is isn't it?). It is 917MB in size. I converted it > > Try lowering the resolution
I'd really rather not reduce the resolution. You lose half of the temporal information doing that. > and quality then, Perhaps I could go lower than the default 50%. I have not really experimented with what I find acceptable in JPEG quality for direct storage and watching. I was so set on convering to MPEG2, in which case I wanted the source material to be as high quality as possible, and seeing as the space usage would only be transient, I was not so concerned about size. > it sounds like you have them set > very high, 10Gb/hour. -d 1, default -q value (50% IIRC). > I've used around 2-3 GB/hour and it looks a lot nicer > than recordings I do with my SVHS vcr. Good to know. But I refer back to my previous message about how much more CPU intensive MJPEG seems to be vs. MPEG2. > It sounded like "not working" was the answer. I got impressions of more success than "not working". I could be wrong. I have not been following all that closely. b. -- Brian J. Murrell
msg00208/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
