On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Ted Unangst <ted.unan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Err, that's supposed to be essential liberty and temporary security. > > Any society that *doesn't* give up at least a little liberty is anarchy and > Franklin was not, to my knowledge, an anarchist.
It seems that You consider killing people on the street to be a part of one's liberty that he trades for public order. A nice way to put to preason everyone because it is a trade off for public, social or whatever security. And to look even more authoritative, You may apply a label "anarchist" to everyone who isn't going to march to prison on his own. -- Dmitrij D. Czarkoff
