This is Theo's list so he can say anything he likes, but like any thread like this just stop feeding it. This thread benefits no one. Not Theo. Not Wikileaks Nobody.
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 18:42 -0700, "Theo de Raadt" <dera...@cvs.openbsd.org> wrote: > > PayPal's terms of use do not permit soliciting crime. > > Paypal's terms of use are just that; terms of use. The account was > being run by the German charity WHS. > > Noone has said that wikileaks has commited a crime. What statute > are you talking about? > > > Wikileaks > > solicits the > > holders of US security clearances to violate their > > non-disclosure agreements. > > That is a crime. > > I hereby ask anyone who holds secrets that the world should know > of, which may contain indications of real crimes having been commited > should send them to wikileaks. > > Did I just commit a crime? Oh, remember I do not live in the US. > > > Some people think it should not be a crime. But it is. Some people > > think that it matters that WIkileaks says that they do not ask for > > submissions. That matters about as much as a mob boss saying that he > > didn't ask anyone to shoot so-and-so, just that wouldn't it be > > fortunate if someone > > did? Wikileaks model is predicated on breaking > > NDAs, and based on what their > > cite on their front pages, breaking NDAs > > on US classified information is their > > biggest product center. > > You think it should be a crime. You just justified skipping due process. > > I hope that one day due process is denied you.
