To judge from the question I don't think you've accurately parsed the argument, which isn't so much about IPv6 per se as about how IETF corrects the mistakes that invariably result in specifying more ambitious protocols like IPv6 or NFSv4 (or doesn't and precludes itself from doing so).
If you nonetheless want to read more about the OpenBSD IPv6 audit of the IPv6 implementation, you might start with something like: http://ipv6samurais.com/ipv6samurais/openbsd-audit/ On 27 Oct 2010, at 22:26, FRLinux wrote: > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Theo de Raadt <dera...@cvs.openbsd.org> > wrote: >> The design process followed by the NFSv4 team members matches the >> methodology taken by the IPV6 people. (As in, once a mistake is made, > > Sorry, I'll bite. What exactly is wrong with IPv6 here? I gathered > from this list not a lot of developers here like it, but I still don't > get it. Please educate me (this should be enlightening). > > Cheers, > Steph [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s]
