On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 10:53 AM, E.T <ad...@wordpress-fr.fr> wrote: >> * Nick <n...@holland-consulting.net> [2010-06-11 12:55]: >>> If you want low power consumption and low cost, I'd suggest a small >>> PIII or Celeron based system, hard to beat for the price (usually, >>> free!). B IF the new, cool stuff has any real power savings, you are >>> unlikely to ever recoup the initial cost over recycled hardware. > > it is a very bad idea, PIII low performance, low puissance, high hot, high > electricity. >
Heh PIII and low performance when comparing with Atom? Are you sure that you know design and construction of Atom? ;-) Same with low puissance, about hot and electricity...there is PIII mobile and then PIII-M which was predecessor to Pentium M > >> that might be (I am not convinced tho) with the electricity price in >> the US, but certainly isn't universal. > > why pay 100dollars/month, 1200dollars/yaer for a server ???. 2 plateform > Atom = 120 dollars, 1 firewall, 1 serveur web, 1 disc openbsd4.7 = 50 > dollars :). Openbsd is very best performance, is best security. One > problem: attack sript-kiddie, server datacenter or server home, the same > thing. 100dollars/month or more is with some services around and you need to know what do you really want. For some people is enough their own small server at home, for some people it's not a way. You think that you will have same security if your server is at home or in some datacenter?...... > > -- > @plus
