On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 2:02 PM, E.T <ad...@wordpress-fr.fr> wrote: >> It looks same http://ark.intel.com/ProductCollection.aspx?familyID=29035 >> , same cache size, same speed, no virtualization support and 510 has >> worse consumption, maybe because of integrated VGA. Why they don't >> specify eg. FSB for D510? Because it's worse? i86 is still same crap >> (and those unreadable and chaotic number of models and specifications >> prove it) because of backward compatibility to 86/186/286/386/486 >> times like various privileged modes which completely bypass any >> security protection in SW. > > Yes exactly, plateform Atom is bad. Low-cost ~60-70dollars. Soekris and > X7SPA-HF cost 250dollars.... . Budget student is impossible.
Are we comparing CPUs or living standard in different countries and professions? If we are talking about money then it's easy. Go for Atom or any other Intel/AMD cheap line of CPUs
