Hi. On Fri, June 12, 2009 17:43, Thomas Pfaff wrote: > On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:21:32 +0100 > Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote: >> In gmane.os.openbsd.misc, Thomas Pfaff wrote: >> > A port of this has already been posted a couple of times but, >> > as someone said, it needs more work. The GUI tool fails for >> > me on amd64 so that needs to be fixed.
Thomas, I'll try to test GUI next week on amd64. >> > There were also some >> > discussion if it should replace apc-upsd or not. It never >> > got any further than that. >> > >> > Anyone with commit access, is there anything else that needs to >> > be fixed in this port for it to be included? >> >> Those are the only things I know of. I'm strongly of the opinion it >> should replace the existing port, and the pkgname stem should stay the >> same so old users can get upgraded with pkg_add -u, even though the >> upstream name changed slightly and it's been largely rewritten. I agree. My answer is still the same: apc-upsd should be removed. > > I tend to agree, but I'm a bit concerned that apcupsd won't work > with the same devices that apc-upsd does. The configuration files > are also very different. > >> I can test on an SU RM via serial and possibly also Symmetra via >> SNMP but don't have time to do the rest of the work, I'm mainly using >> NUT anyway. > > Perhaps we could drop the GUI part of the package for now? At > least then we have a package that works (from the test reports > received so far). > Latest apcupsd-3.14.6 in attachment. [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/gzip which had a name of apcupsd.tar.gz]
