On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Dan <d...@ourbrains.org> wrote: > So it seems like the goal is for it to be as good or better than qmail > if it's going to be smaller, easier to maintain, secure, etc. Then > where's the problem?
Saying qmail has good design is a firm hand you've not actually really worked with it or maintained a large installation of it before. > Who was complaining? There's a difference between suggesting a good > design, such as qmail's and complaining. No, that's bitching about something with an uninformed viewpoint.
