On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Dan <d...@ourbrains.org> wrote:
> So it seems like the goal is for it to be as good or better than qmail
> if it's going to be smaller, easier to maintain, secure, etc. Then
> where's the problem?

Saying qmail has good design is a firm hand you've not actually really
worked with it or maintained a large installation of it before.

> Who was complaining? There's a difference between suggesting a good
> design, such as qmail's and complaining.

No, that's bitching about something with an uninformed viewpoint.

Reply via email to