On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 06:54:24PM -0400, Dan wrote: > Daniel Ouellet(dan...@presscom.net)@2009.05.11 18:08:02 -0400: > >> This new smtpd better be at least as good as qmail, otherwise - what's > >> the point? > > > > For fun and learning dammit. It's been explain on undeadly before and in > > the list. And because it's smaller, easier to maintain, clean and works! > > So it seems like the goal is for it to be as good or better than qmail > if it's going to be smaller, easier to maintain, secure, etc. Then > where's the problem? > > > Always complaining all the time! This really suck big time! > > Who was complaining? There's a difference between suggesting a good > design, such as qmail's and complaining. >
http://wizbangblog.com/images/stfu.jpg -- Gilles Chehade http://www.poolp.org/~gilles/
