[not subscribed, please Cc, thanks.]
theo wrote:
><zeurk...@volny.cz> wrote:
>
>> [not subscribed, please Cc, thanks.]
>>
>> theo wrote:
>> > <zeurk...@volny.cz> wrote:
>> >
>> >> [not subscribed, please Cc, thanks.]
>> >>
>> >> "Jason McIntyre" <j...@kerhand.co.uk> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > hi. the "asix chipset" bit seems unneccessary, since the driver is only
>> >> > for asix chips (as far as i can tell) and quickly skimming online fails
>> >> > to turn up such a model with a different chipset.
>> >>
>> >> Dunno, there might well be a "plain" version with another (unspecified)
>> >> chipset, in which case we'd be confusing people...
>> >
>> > How true. Except there might also be two completely difference ones
>> > which look identical in the box. And your description might not
>> > differentiate
>> > between them!
>>
>> It does, however, constitute a hint that all might not be what it seems.
>
> No, because you've been too precis and claim others don't exist.
Menever made that claim. Indeed, meput the double qotes there to signify
a *lack* of precision (thought merealizes not everyone might understand
that meaning).
--zeur.
--
Friggin' Machines!
