<zeurk...@volny.cz> wrote: > [not subscribed, please Cc, thanks.] > > theo wrote: > > <zeurk...@volny.cz> wrote: > > > >> [not subscribed, please Cc, thanks.] > >> > >> "Jason McIntyre" <j...@kerhand.co.uk> wrote: > >> > > >> > hi. the "asix chipset" bit seems unneccessary, since the driver is only > >> > for asix chips (as far as i can tell) and quickly skimming online fails > >> > to turn up such a model with a different chipset. > >> > >> Dunno, there might well be a "plain" version with another (unspecified) > >> chipset, in which case we'd be confusing people... > > > > How true. Except there might also be two completely difference ones > > which look identical in the box. And your description might not > > differentiate > > between them! > > It does, however, constitute a hint that all might not be what it seems.
No, because you've been too precis and claim others don't exist.
