<zeurk...@volny.cz> wrote: > [not subscribed, please Cc, thanks.] > > "Jason McIntyre" <j...@kerhand.co.uk> wrote: > > > > hi. the "asix chipset" bit seems unneccessary, since the driver is only > > for asix chips (as far as i can tell) and quickly skimming online fails > > to turn up such a model with a different chipset. > > Dunno, there might well be a "plain" version with another (unspecified) > chipset, in which case we'd be confusing people...
How true. Except there might also be two completely difference ones which look identical in the box. And your description might not differentiate between them! The point is our manual pages cannot be overly exact and proscriptive when we aren't in position of 100% of the facts.
