[not subscribed, please Cc, thanks.]
theo wrote:
> <zeurk...@volny.cz> wrote:
>
>> [not subscribed, please Cc, thanks.]
>>
>> "Jason McIntyre" <j...@kerhand.co.uk> wrote:
>> >
>> > hi. the "asix chipset" bit seems unneccessary, since the driver is only
>> > for asix chips (as far as i can tell) and quickly skimming online fails
>> > to turn up such a model with a different chipset.
>>
>> Dunno, there might well be a "plain" version with another (unspecified)
>> chipset, in which case we'd be confusing people...
>
> How true. Except there might also be two completely difference ones
> which look identical in the box. And your description might not differentiate
> between them!
It does, however, constitute a hint that all might not be what it seems.
> The point is our manual pages cannot be overly exact and proscriptive when
> we aren't in position of 100% of the facts.
Of course -- mehas no objection to leaving it out.
--zeur.
--
Friggin' Machines!
