Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:12:58 -0500 Eric Furman <ericfur...@fastmail.net>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016, at 09:10 PM, li...@wrant.com wrote:
> > Wed, 17 Feb 2016 19:36:35 -0500 Eric Furman <ericfur...@fastmail.net>  
> > > Now I'm off to the GNU & Linux lists to spread the gospel of OpenBSD!  
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> Whoa whoa whoa, that is not what I wrote.
> I wrote OS400 and it was a joke.

So appears to be the outrageous topic, well covering up the shocking
facts that new-ware bugs are becoming more and excruciatingly deadlier
fatal ever since last leap leap year.  What an example NOT to get
inspired from: rewriting Unix poorly.

> I'm not going to anybody's list and preaching anything.
> Just to get that clear.

Leave that to me, as previously agreed, !not joking again.  Exactly
like when asked if being approached by a three letter agency for
special code agreements, known to have at least one happening on
commercialised kernels.  One of them examples again, any patterns?

Must be a political thing that comes with infectious spread, gladly
affecting only operating systems like tools with legal departments.

> > Better, influence highly skilled programmers, friends, colleagues,
> > partners, clients, the wide public, classmates, coeds, teachers, book
> > authors and everyone important of the truly free good licenses:
> > 
> > http://www.openbsd.org/policy.html
> > 
> > Most projects out of misinformation pick what some other project did
> > before them and get stuffed with the dysfunctional limiting newer and
> > older versions of the non-Unix recurring acronym advocates of
> > incompatible with freedom politics.  Quality software projects first!
> > 
> > Then educate the worthy developers of useful programs to benefit from
> > and improve their own software products by using correct and free
> > standard compliant coding practices and innovation from the OpenBSD
> > project:
> > 
> > http://www.openbsd.org/innovations.html
> > 
> > Also, popularise to the wide global public that software running
> > successfully on OpenBSD and designed to benefit from the modern best
> > current practices in OpenBSD is inherently multiple orders of magnitude
> > better offset from the start compared to portable incapable slow
> > adoption single kernel only platforms targeting mass consumption only.
> > 
> > And for the business users, let them know that OpenBSD is chosen by
> > many more industry leading companies from all over the world for the
> > first class quality of example setting software, that is actually in
> > active live maintenance for more than 20 years and brought tools and
> > solution all of them use without even realising it most of the time.
> > 
> > http://www.openbsd.org/
> > 
> > OpenBSD provides the best development platform possible and much much
> > more, goals of the project are continuously being met with successful
> > continuation with each release and more over in between:
> > 
> > http://www.openbsd.org/goals.html
> > 
> > But before all this, why not just help test the upcoming release by
> > running latest snapshots and not care for any incoming distractions?
> > 
> > The example OpenBSD sets is quality, ease of use, best developers, and
> > widest adopted true solutions.

Reply via email to