Help, i shot it three times and I'm on my fourth monitor, 3 bullets left. What next?
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Eric Furman <ericfur...@fastmail.net> wrote: > Please don't. This whole thread has gotten really stupid. > Unless you have something funny to add, let's kill it now. > > On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:11 -0700, "Mehma Sarja" <mehmasa...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On 7/11/11 10:48 PM, Andres Perera wrote: >> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:43 PM, patrick keshishian<pkesh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> you failed at making any point. >> > i'll rebrand it into convenient twitter format: >> > >> > debian splits packages to the point where a single service is a >> > associated to a single top level package, meaning that there's never a >> > reason for unused installed services >> > >> > openbsd limitations do not apply 1:1 to other systems unless they >> > happen to be openbsd. in the previous sentence, "openbsd" can be >> > replaced by any word >> > >> OK, I got the first paragraph but not the second. Could you please >> "rebrand" it so people like me can unnerstand? I just got off the boat. >> To be clear, which is my thing today, here is how I read the "openbsd >> limitations..." sentence: OpenBSD limitations apply only to OpenBSD. As >> my 4-year old would say, "Hello..." Your last sentence is equally >> baffling. I understand you may be mad at some responders, but the lack >> of clarity makes us haze over your argument and take the topic off on a >> tangent that you do not like. And that makes you mad, it is a Type A >> thing - we understand. >> >> Simple, clear sentences sting the most. >> >> Mehma
