brraaiiinsss..... B-)
On Jul 12, 2011, at 7:25 PM, Zeb Packard wrote: > I think it worked. > > Sent from my iclone. > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Marco Peereboom <sl...@peereboom.us> wrote: >> shoot it again son. >> >> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 03:59:31PM -0700, Zeb Packard wrote: >>> Help, i shot it three times and I'm on my fourth monitor, 3 bullets >>> left. What next? >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Eric Furman <ericfur...@fastmail.net> > wrote: >>>> Please don't. This whole thread has gotten really stupid. >>>> Unless you have something funny to add, let's kill it now. >>>> >>>> On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 14:11 -0700, "Mehma Sarja" <mehmasa...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> On 7/11/11 10:48 PM, Andres Perera wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:43 PM, patrick > keshishian<pkesh...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>>>>> you failed at making any point. >>>>>> i'll rebrand it into convenient twitter format: >>>>>> >>>>>> debian splits packages to the point where a single service is a >>>>>> associated to a single top level package, meaning that there's never > a >>>>>> reason for unused installed services >>>>>> >>>>>> openbsd limitations do not apply 1:1 to other systems unless they >>>>>> happen to be openbsd. in the previous sentence, "openbsd" can be >>>>>> replaced by any word >>>>>> >>>>> OK, I got the first paragraph but not the second. Could you please >>>>> "rebrand" it so people like me can unnerstand? I just got off the boat. >>>>> To be clear, which is my thing today, here is how I read the "openbsd >>>>> limitations..." sentence: OpenBSD limitations apply only to OpenBSD. As >>>>> my 4-year old would say, "Hello..." Your last sentence is equally >>>>> baffling. I understand you may be mad at some responders, but the lack >>>>> of clarity makes us haze over your argument and take the topic off on a >>>>> tangent that you do not like. And that makes you mad, it is a Type A >>>>> thing - we understand. >>>>> >>>>> Simple, clear sentences sting the most. >>>>> >>>>> Mehma [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s]
