On 7/11/11 10:48 PM, Andres Perera wrote:
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 11:43 PM, patrick keshishian<pkesh...@gmail.com> wrote:
you failed at making any point.
i'll rebrand it into convenient twitter format:
debian splits packages to the point where a single service is a
associated to a single top level package, meaning that there's never a
reason for unused installed services
openbsd limitations do not apply 1:1 to other systems unless they
happen to be openbsd. in the previous sentence, "openbsd" can be
replaced by any word
OK, I got the first paragraph but not the second. Could you please
"rebrand" it so people like me can unnerstand? I just got off the boat.
To be clear, which is my thing today, here is how I read the "openbsd
limitations..." sentence: OpenBSD limitations apply only to OpenBSD. As
my 4-year old would say, "Hello..." Your last sentence is equally
baffling. I understand you may be mad at some responders, but the lack
of clarity makes us haze over your argument and take the topic off on a
tangent that you do not like. And that makes you mad, it is a Type A
thing - we understand.
Simple, clear sentences sting the most.
Mehma
