On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net> wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net> >> wrote: >> > We also set the register width equal to the dispatch width. Right now, >> > this is effectively a no-op since we don't do anything with it. >> > However, >> > it will be important once we add an actual width field to fs_reg. >> >> I don't really see the point to be honest. We just wind up calling the >> constructor >1 time. >> >> I could see maybe see making them static members just to reduce their >> scope. > > > The point is to get a null register with a width of dispatch_width. We need > that later.
Ah, okay. Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
