On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net> > wrote: > > We also set the register width equal to the dispatch width. Right now, > > this is effectively a no-op since we don't do anything with it. However, > > it will be important once we add an actual width field to fs_reg. > > I don't really see the point to be honest. We just wind up calling the > constructor >1 time. > > I could see maybe see making them static members just to reduce their > scope. > The point is to get a null register with a width of dispatch_width. We need that later.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
