I'm a little sentimental about r300, but you're right. There is no value to listing hw drivers that will never do GL3, just as there will soon be no value to listing GL 3.0 and 3.1 status, because it will all be done.
Marek On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Ian Romanick <i...@freedesktop.org> wrote: >>> +GL_ARB_shading_language_420pack DONE (i965, r600, >>> radeonsi) >> >> Because of the way it was implemented, I think this should say "All >> drivers that support GLSL 1.30." > > In a similar vein, I wonder if there's any value at all to listing > i915, r300, and swrast in this file (the drivers that will never do > GL3). At least for me, the usefulness of the file has always been to > see how far off some capable hardware's driver is from supporting a GL > version. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
