On 26.01.2017 14:18, Emil Velikov wrote:
From: Emil Velikov <emil.veli...@collabora.com>
Follow the approach set in the file and handle all the ops, as otherwise
the compiler throws a bunch of lovely warnings.
Note that some versions of GCC have -Wswitch implied by -Wall, latter of
which set in out autoconf and scons builds.
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov <emil.veli...@collabora.com>
This patch is likely to clash with the 64-bit enablement patch that I'm
about to land.
Patches 4-6:
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <nicolai.haeh...@amd.com>
---
src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp
b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp
index a437645d9e..b154fad185 100644
--- a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp
+++ b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_glsl_to_tgsi.cpp
@@ -2319,6 +2319,33 @@ glsl_to_tgsi_visitor::visit_expression(ir_expression*
ir, st_src_reg *op)
case ir_binop_carry:
case ir_binop_borrow:
case ir_unop_ssbo_unsized_array_length:
+ case ir_unop_bitcast_i642d:
+ case ir_unop_bitcast_d2u64:
+ case ir_unop_bitcast_d2i64:
+ case ir_unop_i642i:
+ case ir_unop_u642i:
+ case ir_unop_i642u:
+ case ir_unop_u642u:
+ case ir_unop_i642b:
+ case ir_unop_i642f:
+ case ir_unop_u642f:
+ case ir_unop_i642d:
+ case ir_unop_u642d:
+ case ir_unop_i2i64:
+ case ir_unop_u2i64:
+ case ir_unop_b2i64:
+ case ir_unop_f2i64:
+ case ir_unop_d2i64:
+ case ir_unop_i2u64:
+ case ir_unop_u2u64:
+ case ir_unop_f2u64:
+ case ir_unop_d2u64:
+ case ir_unop_u642i64:
+ case ir_unop_i642u64:
+ case ir_unop_pack_int_2x32:
+ case ir_unop_pack_uint_2x32:
+ case ir_unop_unpack_int_2x32:
+ case ir_unop_unpack_uint_2x32:
/* This operation is not supported, or should have already been handled.
*/
assert(!"Invalid ir opcode in glsl_to_tgsi_visitor::visit()");
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
