-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06/05/2011 02:44 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > I have a naive question: why are we allocating stencil/depth/aux buffers > through X/DRI2? > > I can understand for the sake of interoperability why the color buffer > attachments are negotiated with X, but I can't see any reason why X > wants to know about the others.
Because multiple processes can render to the same window, pbuffer, or pixmap, and they'll want the same set of buffers. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk3rv8UACgkQX1gOwKyEAw+F5wCgjUAuyABkolANadSNngaKjjUo t2oAnjAltSzRiIYMXT+Xoad/FqscgOzd =++lE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
