Alan, I'm laughing. "Smack around" is a great way to put it.
Boards can dictate to individual licensees but not to facilities, right?
So let's say that neither JCAHO, nor CMS nor the Department of Health
require this extra eMAR security strategy that is being discussed. Does
a Pharmacy board really have the authority to institute such a specific
regulation ("you must have a second sign-on process for an eMAR"? If so,
how would Pharmacists across the state be notified of the mandate? Would
the requirement be written into administrative law, so that if you were
reading your Practice Act, you would see it there?
Or would a Pharmacist simply be expected to know whether a second
sign-on is the standard of practice, and ensure that, if it is, the
process occurs in his/her facility?
I've been curious for a long time about boards, their authority, and
professional misconduct cases, so this discussion has piqued my
interest. Sharon
-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 6:27 AM
To: Deborah L O'Briant; Kenny Whiteside; Sharon LaDuke; Kimberly Frick;
meditech-l@mtusers.com; Bill Mullins
Subject: Re: [MEDITECH-L] Access to eMAR
Pharmacy is ultimately responsible for everything related to medication
in your facility. If it concerns medications and the Board of Pharmacy
finds something they don't like, they have every right to smack your
pharmacy/pharmacists around to ensure compliance with state/federal
pharmacy regs, even if the pharmacy has little actual control over the
situation. In the eyes of the Board, it's usually a matter of "public
safety".
Alan Miller, RPh
Pharmacist
Patient Care Information Systems
Catawba Valley Medical Center
810 Fairgrove Church Road
Hickory, NC 28602
>>> "Sharon LaDuke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/20/2007 21:14 >>>
Can a state Pharmacy board dictate what is done by any discipline other
than pharmacists? I don't get it. Sharon
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Mullins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 6:10 PM
To: Kimberly Frick; Sharon LaDuke; Kenny Whiteside; Deborah L O'Briant;
meditech-l@MTUsers.com
Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] Access to eMAR
We did not have this requirement in Tn, 5 yrs ago, I do not know about
it now...
-----Original Message-----
From: meditech-l@MTUsers.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kimberly Frick
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 9:21 AM
To: Sharon LaDuke; Kenny Whiteside; Deborah L O'Briant;
meditech-l@MTUsers.com
Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] Access to eMAR
I thought that an additional level of authentication was unnecessary
too, but our State Pharmacy Board requires it. This level of security
doesn't exist in the paper MAR world, so why is it so restrictive in the
electronic version?
Our State Board of Pharmacy requires us to enter our pin last, so we did
not have a choice for that either. The only advantage I can see of
entering it last is that you can access the e-mar to view the MAR, run
MAR reports or do anything else except document without entering your
pin. The "enter pin" prompt only comes up when you document something.
Kim Frick, RN
Project Coordinator
Licking Memorial Health Systems
Phone: 740-348-4114
Fax: 740-348-4769
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.LMHealth.org
-----Original Message-----
From: meditech-l@MTUsers.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Sharon LaDuke
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 7:36 AM
To: Kenny Whiteside; Deborah L O'Briant; meditech-l@MTUsers.com
Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] Access to eMAR
I recently worked for a multi-facility organization which did not
require anything additional for eMAR access. No problems that I ever
heard of. Sharon
-----Original Message-----
From: meditech-l@MTUsers.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kenny Whiteside
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 2:42 PM
To: Deborah L O'Briant; meditech-l@MTUsers.com
Subject: Re: [MEDITECH-L] Access to eMAR
Deborah,
We just had this discussion this afternoon also! If your nurses ALWAYS
log off when they walk away from their computers.... I would say that
the redundancy would be insane. But I also know that in the fast-paced,
pulled in every direction at once world of hospital nursing... that's
not likely to happen. For this reason, we chose to require the user's
password when entering the eMAR from the Status Board.
But who knows, maybe someday we will decide that this is not
necessary!
Have a good weekend,
Kenny Whiteside
>>> "O'Briant, Deborah L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/11/2007 11:38
PM >>>
Hello All,
I am trying to gauge how the majority of sites live with the eMAR set
up their password/pin options in MIS. We are currently using the NUR
Status Board and the Project lead for nursing wants to take out any
additional requirement to authenticate the user signing on to the eMAR.
The thought is that the original request for a user mnemonic/password to
log onto Meditech is sufficient and asking for the password again if
accessing the eMAR, once in the Status Board, is redundant (we've set it
up so all inpatient nurses get the Status Board upon successful
sign-in).
Our State Board of Pharmacy does not currently have any specific
guidelines (yet) for us to follow.
Has anyone experienced problems (ie, diversion) with the eMar and what
security was in place at the time? I am trying to think of every
scenario where having no additional requirement to access the eMAR might
get us into trouble.
I greatly appreciate anyone taking a minute to answer this posting!
Thanks in advance!
Deborah O'Briant
Sr. Project Manager
IT Applications
Arkansas Children's Hospital
(501) 364-3643
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential
and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering
this
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify
us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your
computer.
Thank you.
========================================================================
======
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content, and is
believed to be clean.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content, and is
believed to be clean.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
To subscribe or unsubscribe to the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.
To check the status of the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.
For help, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit the MTUsers WikiPedia at MTUsers.NET/mwiki
______________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
meditech-l@MTUsers.com
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
To subscribe or unsubscribe to the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.
To check the status of the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.
For help, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit the MTUsers WikiPedia at MTUsers.NET/mwiki
______________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
meditech-l@MTUsers.com
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
To subscribe or unsubscribe to the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.
To check the status of the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.
For help, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit the MTUsers WikiPedia at MTUsers.NET/mwiki
______________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
meditech-l@MTUsers.com
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
Sophos and MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses.
**********************************************************************
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
To subscribe or unsubscribe to the meditech-l, visit
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l_mtusers.com
To check the status of the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET
For help, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please visit and add information to the MTUsers WikiPedia at
MTUsers.NET/mwiki
______________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
meditech-l@MTUsers.com
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l_mtusers.com
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content, and is
believed to be clean.
Catawba Valley Medical Center
810 Fairgrove Church Rd
Hickory NC 28602
828-326-3000
**This electronic message may contain information that is confidential
and/or legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the
individual(s) and entity named as recipients in the message, please
notify the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer.
Do not deliever, distribute or copy this message, and do not disclose
its contents or take any action in reliance on the information it
contains.
Thank you
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content, and is
believed to be clean.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
To subscribe or unsubscribe to the meditech-l, visit
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l_mtusers.com
To check the status of the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET
For help, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please visit and add information to the MTUsers WikiPedia at MTUsers.NET/mwiki
______________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
meditech-l@MTUsers.com
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l_mtusers.com
