What a problem for Windows PCs! It doesn't sound like as much of a
problem for *nix PCs, however. You would actually be logging into your
own session on a server, locking it, and then coming back to it. Don't
think Meditech works with the *nix systems yet, though.

Donald F. Stewart


-----Original Message-----
From: meditech-l@MTUsers.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Davis Daniel - Southern Hills
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 2:01 PM
To: Kenny Whiteside; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; meditech-l@MTUsers.com
Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] Access to eMAR

Now that's a neat trick if you can do it!  Think of the logistics
involved with grabbing the complete state of everything on a PC and then
recreating that on a different PC anywhere on the network.  That would
nearly require that the PC reboot for each user, and all of that data
would have to be transmitted across the network to that new PC (that is
if you could even figure out a way to store it in the first place).
Wow!  What a problem.

Daniel Davis

-----Original Message-----
From: meditech-l@MTUsers.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kenny Whiteside
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 9:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; meditech-l@MTUsers.com
Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] Access to eMAR

Perhaps!  I'm not an IT person... but my understanding of proximity
cards is that they simply lock the computer or automatically log the
user off.  That might help prevent the need for additional
authentication once logged in if no one else can access that computer
until the logged in user returns.  But that creates additional problems.

And the second part of what I believe nurses need is to be able to walk
up to ANY other computer and the session that they are logged into is
"brought" to that computer for them exactly where they were rather than
having to start back at the beginning of the log-in process.  You see,
the problem is that the process of "logging in" that we use was designed
for an office environment.  Healthcare is migratory in nature!  And that
is especially true for nursing!

Thanks,
Kenny Whiteside

>>> "Saira Somani-Mendelin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/19/07 10:36
AM >>>
Would proximity cards not be helpful in the situations you describe?

-----Original Message-----
From: meditech-l@MTUsers.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kenny Whiteside
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 8:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; meditech-l@MTUsers.com
Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] Access to eMAR

I can see the need for the additional authentication (although as a
nurse I would prefer that this not be necessary!)  The difference in
paper versus electronic documentation is that on paper, you have an
opportunity to examine handwriting to determine whether the
documentation was forged by another person.  Not true with electronic
documentation.

Image a computer at the bedside of a computer savy patient.  The nurse
is documenting the physical assessment when there is a code blue two
doors down.  Do you think she will log-out before responding?  It would
be bad if the patient viewed HIPPA protected information.  But it could
be a patient safety issue if they documented that meds were given that
were not!  And there would be no way in the record to determine that it
was NOT the nurse who documented this information!

Until the healthcare environment has reliable technology to
automatically disable the nurse's session when she walks away from a
computer and then return that session to any computer that she walks up
to.... this will continue to be a problem.  I look forward to the day
that there is a good solution to this.

My humble opinion!

Thanks,
Kenny Whiteside

>>> "Kimberly Frick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/18/07 10:21 AM >>>
I thought that an additional level of authentication was unnecessary
too, but our State Pharmacy Board requires it. This level of security
doesn't exist in the paper MAR world, so why is it so restrictive in the
electronic version?  
Our State Board of Pharmacy requires us to enter our pin last, so we did
not have a choice for that either. The only advantage I can see of
entering it last is that you can access the e-mar to view the MAR, run
MAR reports or do anything else except document without entering your
pin. The "enter pin" prompt only comes up when you document something.

 
Kim Frick, RN
Project Coordinator
Licking Memorial Health Systems
Phone: 740-348-4114
Fax: 740-348-4769
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.LMHealth.org
 


-----Original Message-----
From: meditech-l@MTUsers.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Sharon LaDuke
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 7:36 AM
To: Kenny Whiteside; Deborah L O'Briant; meditech-l@MTUsers.com
Subject: RE: [MEDITECH-L] Access to eMAR


I recently worked for a multi-facility organization which did not
require anything additional for eMAR access. No problems that I ever
heard of. Sharon

-----Original Message-----
From: meditech-l@MTUsers.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Kenny Whiteside
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 2:42 PM
To: Deborah L O'Briant; meditech-l@MTUsers.com
Subject: Re: [MEDITECH-L] Access to eMAR

Deborah,

We just had this discussion this afternoon also!  If your nurses ALWAYS
log off when they walk away from their computers.... I would say that
the redundancy would be insane.  But I also know that in the fast-paced,
pulled in every direction at once world of hospital nursing... that's
not likely to happen.  For this reason, we chose to require the user's
password when entering the eMAR from the Status Board.

But who knows, maybe someday we will decide that this is not necessary!

Have a good weekend,
Kenny Whiteside

>>> "O'Briant, Deborah L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06/11/2007 11:38
PM >>>
Hello All, 
 
I am trying to gauge how the majority of sites live with the eMAR set up
their password/pin options in MIS. We are currently using the NUR Status
Board and the Project lead for nursing wants to take out any additional
requirement to authenticate the user signing on to the eMAR.
The thought is that the original request for a user mnemonic/password to
log onto Meditech is sufficient and asking for the password again if
accessing the eMAR, once in the Status Board, is redundant (we've set it
up so all inpatient nurses get the Status Board upon successful
sign-in). 
 
Our State Board of Pharmacy does not currently have any specific
guidelines (yet) for us to follow. 
 
Has anyone experienced problems (ie, diversion) with the eMar and what
security was in place at the time? I am trying to think of every
scenario where having no additional requirement to access the eMAR might
get us into trouble. 
 
I greatly appreciate anyone taking a minute to answer this posting! 
Thanks in advance!
 
Deborah O'Briant
Sr. Project Manager
IT Applications
Arkansas Children's Hospital
(501) 364-3643
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader of this
message is not the

intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering
this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any
dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from
your computer.
Thank you.
========================================================================
======

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content, and is
believed to be clean.


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content, and is
believed to be clean.

=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
To subscribe or unsubscribe to the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.

To check the status of the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.

For help, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Visit the MTUsers WikiPedia at MTUsers.NET/mwiki
______________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
meditech-l@MTUsers.com
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l

=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
To subscribe or unsubscribe to the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.

To check the status of the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.

For help, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Visit the MTUsers WikiPedia at MTUsers.NET/mwiki
______________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
meditech-l@MTUsers.com
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content, and is
believed to be clean.



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content, and is
believed to be clean.


=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
To subscribe or unsubscribe to the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.

To check the status of the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.

For help, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Visit the MTUsers WikiPedia at MTUsers.NET/mwiki
______________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
meditech-l@MTUsers.com
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content, and is
believed to be clean.



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content, and is
believed to be clean.


=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
To subscribe or unsubscribe to the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.

To check the status of the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.

For help, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Visit the MTUsers WikiPedia at MTUsers.NET/mwiki
______________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
meditech-l@MTUsers.com
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l

=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
To subscribe or unsubscribe to the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.

To check the status of the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.

For help, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Visit the MTUsers WikiPedia at MTUsers.NET/mwiki
______________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
meditech-l@MTUsers.com
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l

--

This message has been scanned by the Securiant SpiderISA for spam and
viruses, and is believed to be safe and clean.







--

This message has been scanned by the Securiant SpiderISA for spam and viruses, 
and is believed to be safe and clean.







=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
To subscribe or unsubscribe to the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.

To check the status of the meditech-l, visit MTUsers.NET.

For help, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Visit the MTUsers WikiPedia at MTUsers.NET/mwiki
______________________________________
meditech-l mailing list
meditech-l@MTUsers.com
http://mtusers.com/mailman/listinfo/meditech-l

Reply via email to