On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 04:55 AM, hari kumar wrote: > > But I also have a serious rejoinder that Sartesian should consider also > (at least in my view). That is whatever the historical survey - what > alternative do you Sartesian propose? > .... > I know that Lenin rightly also tells us that the class learns at certain > revolutionary times in history more than a century of other times (forget > exact quite - but that is its gist). Is it a reliance on this that > underlies your eschewing of any actions other than a sudden transforming > lightning bolt of revolutionary intent? No prior structures, vehicles, > forms to prepare? I am not goading, I just don't get the structure. > >
H- To your first question-- please take the time to read my post above that contains my "alternative." To the second--I'm not eschewing any actions, discounting structures, vehicles, forms. I've written nothing that means that or indicate a belief in pure spontaneity. I oppose the view that viable, class based structures, vehicles, forms will be built by entry into, a tactical alliance with, or support of a capitalist part y or institution. So the questions remain--where has collaboration with, support of bourgeois parties advanced the "self-organization" of the proletariat? Where has entry into a bourgeois party "complemented" extra parliamentary class struggle? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#33047): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/33047 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/109066560/21656 -=-=- POSTING RULES & NOTES #1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message. #2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived. #3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern. #4 Do not exceed five posts a day. -=-=- Group Owner: marxmail+ow...@groups.io Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/13617172/21656/1316126222/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
