Hi! There is RFC’s how to retire a RBL.
And they can also just retire the pointers to the rbl mirrors so it won’t cost them resources. It’s just crazy how this is handled even for 2 hours! Perhaps they can explain why they would be between a rock and a hard place. As it does not make sense to me at all right now. With kind regards, Raymond Dijkxhoorn > Op 7 mrt 2025 om 11:20 heeft Carsten Schiefner via mailop <mailop@mailop.org> > het volgende geschreven: > > Hi Raymond & all, > >> On 07.03.2025 10:43, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote: >> A very very bad example of how not to retire a rbl. >> What they did was just list the world and let everybody suffer with it. This >> is just a very malicious act and not now things should have executed at all. > > true. > > OTOH - as Florian has suggested, as the ops is back to normal after "only" > two hours or so -, this could also have easily been a shot across the bow to > rattle the beds of all the admins that have continued to doze away after the > initial announcement and probably a couple of 1:1 reminders. > > As in: "This is going to happen to you and your org after 16 July - > permanently! And not just for two hours. Wake up and get your stuff fixed!" > > They might not have know to help themselves otherwise, after all. A decision > made between a rock and a hard place... > > Cheers, > > -C. > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
