It's possible that the system that marks the e-mail with the
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: ...;SFV:SPM;... also sends it to the
less-reputable-ip-address pool to be sent out, so one would think that
basing a filter off of X-Forefront-Antispam-Report *should* be enough.
https://www.mail-archive.com/mailop@mailop.org/msg05498.html
Sorry for butting in, long time lurker that had a bit of time to catch up.
Cheers,
On 11/11/24 14:50, Robert Giles via mailop wrote:
Interesting; is there a straightforward way to drop that traffic entirely?
I think the HRDP IPs and hostnames are probably indistinguishable for
folks outside of the Microsoft ecosystem, and
"OutboundIpPoolName=HighRiskOutboundPool" is some tenant-viewable
internal marker that's not actually embedded in the transmitted message.
Robert
On 11/11/2024 at 06:15, Scott Q. via mailop wrote:
But it's not really the same. Not all providers offer free accounts
which clearly attracts abusers a lot more than paid accounts.
Furthermore, not all providers do this:
"Segregation of outbound email traffic: Every outbound message that's
sent through the service is scanned for spam. If the message is
determined to be spam, it's delivered from a secondary, less reputable
IP address pool named the high-risk delivery pool. For more
information, see..."
"https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-office-365/outbound-spam-
protection-about <https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-
office-365/outbound-spam-protection-about>"
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
