Dnia 16.10.2024 o godz. 15:03:19 Michael Orlitzky via mailop pisze:
> > 2. The benefit you cite is the usual one for the sender, but a) it 
> > ignores issues with receivers, and b) it ignores multi-hop scenarios.
> 
> What issues? A priori, recipients ignore it. It doesn't get much easier
> than that.

Which means, in short, that the senders you are talking about set up SPF
only because "big" receivers require it. Not for any actual, measurable
improvement, but because they are simply *forced* to do so. (BTW, I do
exactly the same thing).

My opinion is that it is crazy and it shows how crazy idea SPF is.
-- 
Regards,
   Jaroslaw Rafa
   r...@rafa.eu.org
--
"In a million years, when kids go to school, they're gonna know: once there
was a Hushpuppy, and she lived with her daddy in the Bathtub."
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to