On 8 Feb 2021, at 21:20, Dave Warren via mailop wrote:

On 2021-02-08 16:14, Bill Cole via mailop wrote:
[...]
The "de-tagging" tactic that Al noted has existed, although I don't see much evidence of it in recent years. I think it may be that enough people who use tagged addresses give tagged addresses less scrutiny that senders who paid attention noticed that de-tagging hurts deliverability.

There is also the possibility to give anything missing a tag extreme scrutiny

Everything is relative :)

(or outright reject it) if a user is careful to never give out untagged addresses.

Yes. e.g.: I have a ridiculously strict local IP blocklist fed by automated mechanisms which sometimes list whole RIR allocations. It is used via scoring before SMTP and in content filtering, but for untagged addresses it is also used as an absolute ban if nothing else known at RCPT time (i.e. recipient address tagging or other stuff) exempts the message.

Beyond that, many years ago I turned my nominally 'main' email address with which I use local-part tagging into a virtual address that is not an authentication identity on any system. OTOH, the "real" address to which my tagged addresses deliver (and which is used for authentication) is not actually mailable. That's an extremely useful secondary effect of intensive tagged-address usage, since the credential-stuffers all try tagged addresses or the de-tagged 'main address" and so are easy to identify without depending on rate or volume of attempts. No address that anyone knows legitimately is part of any credential set.

By definition there is no consent given to a sender who just makes up their own addresses (by stripping or changing tags), which is significant to any sender trying to operate on an opt-in basis.

Absolutely correct.

--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to