Thanks John. Sent from my phone
> On Sep 4, 2020, at 2:23 PM, John Levine via mailop <mailop@mailop.org> wrote: > > In article <0aec348a-e629-4837-a58a-154c48b43...@gmail.com>, > vom513 via mailop <vom...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Yes. So what? The cost of sending and and processing the reports is >>> trivial. >> >> Agreed - I’m not concerned about the costs of sending or processing. These >> “backscatter” reports skew my >> data. I see data points from target.com and I have to mentally filter these >> when looking thinking “oh yeah this >> is them sending me backscatter”. I could filter the data as well - but this >> brings me back to my original point - >> shouldn’t folks not send agg reports for their received reports in the first >> place ? > > Please read RFC 7489 and tell us where it says not to do that. (Spoiler: it > doesn't.) > > R's, > John > -- > Regards, > John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for > Dummies", > Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly > > > _______________________________________________ > mailop mailing list > mailop@mailop.org > https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
