In article <0aec348a-e629-4837-a58a-154c48b43...@gmail.com>, vom513 via mailop <vom...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Yes. So what? The cost of sending and and processing the reports is >> trivial. > >Agreed - Iâm not concerned about the costs of sending or processing. These >âbackscatterâ reports skew my >data. I see data points from target.com and I have to mentally filter these >when looking thinking âoh yeah this >is them sending me backscatterâ. I could filter the data as well - but this >brings me back to my original point - >shouldnât folks not send agg reports for their received reports in the first >place ?
Please read RFC 7489 and tell us where it says not to do that. (Spoiler: it doesn't.) R's, John -- Regards, John Levine, jo...@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
