In article <6faf3f49-918a-4469-a3bb-04153d8d2...@wordtothewise.com> you write: >-=-=-=-=-=- >-=-=-=-=-=- > >Or this spam header that just landed in my inbox coming from a domain >registered yesterday. Does have SPF, bounce and >5322.from are aligned. Everything is there to use BIMI, once the publish a >couple DNS records.
The BIMI group claims senders will have to validate their logos and get a certificate before recipient systems will display them. This always seemed to me the weakest part of the plan. It's easy enough to do for Paypal and a handful of big banks but not at scale since it's essentially doing trademark examination which is neither quick nor cheap. Here's an overview I helped them put together: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bkl-bimi-overview-00 _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
