Ah I see. That makes sense. Things like "Mailbox Over Quota" or a slew of
other errors that are "non-temporary" but don't specifically indicate "this
mailbox doesn't exist" are probably worth a couple of tries. I've heard
people say you should retry an address that returned "5xx No such user" or
"5xx invalid recipient address" and I thought that's what you were
suggesting.

On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 1:00 PM Michael Wise via mailop <mailop@mailop.org>
wrote:

>
>
> Sometimes, for reasons beyond the recipient’s control, things go wrong.
>
> Mailbox gets attacked and goes over quota.
>
> DNS servers go down (should never happen, but)
>
> BGP hijack.
>
>
>
> All sorts of things are possible.
>
> But if you’re getting a bounce, and the server or account is down for more
> than a day, and you’re trying to re-engage, then remove ‘em.
>
> Hard and fast rules are good in theory, lousy in practice, just like
> practical rules can be horrible in theory.
>
> Somewhere in the middle is the truth.
>
> But don’t ignore signals.
>
>
>
> Aloha,
>
> Michael.
>
> --
>
> *Michael J Wise*
> Microsoft Corporation| Spam Analysis
>
> "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed."
>
> Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool
> <http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=18275> ?
>
>
>
> *From:* Luke <lukemarti...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 19, 2019 12:48 PM
> *To:* Michael Wise <michael.w...@microsoft.com>
> *Cc:* Ken O'Driscoll via mailop <mailop@mailop.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [mailop] Best Re-engagement Email
>
>
>
> Are you saying you should retry an address once or twice even if it
> bounces?
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019, 12:31 PM Michael Wise via mailop <mailop@mailop.org>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> And if it bounces …
>
> Emergency Stop Emailing Immediately!
>
>
>
> Maybe try again once of twice, but if all those fail, for goodness sake,
> remove their name permanently.
>
>
>
> Aloha,
>
> Michael.
>
> --
>
> *Michael J Wise*
> Microsoft Corporation| Spam Analysis
>
> "Your Spam Specimen Has Been Processed."
>
> Got the Junk Mail Reporting Tool
> <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.microsoft.com%2Fen-us%2Fdownload%2Fdetails.aspx%3Fid%3D18275&data=02%7C01%7CMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7Cf259fccfcf52434d983008d73d3a45a0%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637045192796842467&sdata=UYeFNvDCwCBdFOBVs40UrSGKludRY29so8%2F0Ycv%2FMvo%3D&reserved=0>
> ?
>
>
>
> *From:* mailop <mailop-boun...@mailop.org> *On Behalf Of *Laura Atkins
> via mailop
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 19, 2019 9:38 AM
> *To:* Michael Peddemors <mich...@linuxmagic.com>
> *Cc:* mailop@mailop.org
> *Subject:* Re: [mailop] Best Re-engagement Email
>
>
>
>
>
> On 19 Sep 2019, at 16:47, Michael Peddemors via mailop <mailop@mailop.org>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2019-09-19 8:35 a.m., Al Iverson via mailop wrote:
>
> Thus there are three categories of subscriber responses:
> - Clicked on unsub link or "no" button. Stop mailing.
> - Clicked on opt-in link or "yes" button. Continue mailing.
> - Did nothing. Send one reminder mail asking them again to opt-in in
> 7-10 days. After that, let them go. Stop mailing them.
>
>
> +1, and can we go even further?  Confirmed double opt-in subscribers are
> MUCH more valuable that single opt-in, you might even consider keeping all
> confirmed double opt-in completely separate from other types of mailings,
> so that that part of your service always has the highest reputation.
>
>
>
> But you still need to pay attention to engagement with your confirmed
> subscribers. And reconfirming folks who confirmed 5 years ago but have not
> clicked on any link or opened anything or logged into your website in the
> previous 3 years is a good idea, no matter that they confirmed years ago.
>
>
>
> laura
>
>
>
> --
>
> Having an Email Crisis?  We can help! 800 823-9674
>
>
>
> Laura Atkins
>
> Word to the Wise
>
> la...@wordtothewise.com
>
> (650) 437-0741
>
>
>
> Email Delivery Blog: https://wordtothewise.com/blog
> <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwordtothewise.com%2Fblog&data=02%7C01%7CMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7Cf259fccfcf52434d983008d73d3a45a0%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637045192796852461&sdata=3%2Bo3LwqxWfVsoKZvM1ngAE5mdM%2FXX9xsUDaPmBMVptA%3D&reserved=0>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
> <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fchilli.nosignal.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmailop&data=02%7C01%7CMichael.Wise%40microsoft.com%7Cf259fccfcf52434d983008d73d3a45a0%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637045192796852461&sdata=y%2F5z357hZbNPEnZRrLud76gVmTqfXOkghKgMXE7izDo%3D&reserved=0>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mailop mailing list
> mailop@mailop.org
> https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
>
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop

Reply via email to