> On Apr 10, 2017, at 1:11 PM, Steve Atkins <st...@blighty.com> wrote: > >> >> On Apr 10, 2017, at 1:01 PM, Philip Paeps <phi...@trouble.is> wrote: >> >> On 2017-04-10 21:50:01 (+0200), valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: >>> >>> >>> On the other hand, having a forum where you can ask "Are the guys who are >>> supposed to be dealing with ab...@robot-penguins.xyz merely clueless or >>> actively rogue?" or "Does anybody have a contact at >>> helium-filled-cows.com?" does have value.... >> >> I think this mailing list serves that purpose quite well. :) > > That's not what it's for. > > It is (was?) for operational email issues. Discussion of spam was off-topic > unless it had operational relevance. "I got spam from production.outlook.com, > did anyone else?" is not that. > > It was lower volume and more useful when that was policed.
(I'm not suggesting that the list owners aren't policing it - points at Subject line - just that the current subscriber base is perhaps less compliant than they could be). Cheers, Steve _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
