In article <ca+e3k93bawnccz222rosns6bxdxpx5r2zscd9fzjszvbw7l...@mail.gmail.com> you write: >Don't abuse fighters usually need to know WHOIS data, not to act on it >directly ourselves ... but rather to direct *someone else's* attention >to the registrant? Like their network upstream, or their systems >"upstream" (hosting provider), or law enforcement, etc.?
Often. Or you can look at the WHOIS for a bunch of domains to see that they're the same guy, since even when they lie, there's a pattern to the lies. >Isn't the problem with domain anonymity that it increases the cost of >enforcement? Not just that, in some cases it makes enforcement impossible, since bad guys hop from domain to domain. >Is there a way to decrease the cost of enforcement, and to increase >leverage over abusive domains, while still allowing private >registration? Sure. Do what .CA does, limit proxies to natural people, and remove the proxy if the domain is used for commercial purposes. R's, John _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
