On 03/26/2017 01:58 PM, John Levine wrote:
But I can't help noticing that people keep trying to change the topic.
Not changing the topic, refuting your statement that no one needs their
own domain name to communicate on the Internet.
Once again, nobody* has a problem with privacy protection for the
small minority of domains registered by natural persons. The problem
is that the pro-crime crowd keep demanding that all the rest be
anonymous or effectively anonymous, too.
* - for a version of nobody informed by going to a lot of recent ICANN
meetings
As someone who believes that privacy is useful for businesses as well as
people, I don't appreciate being referred to as "pro-crime."
As someone who is asserting that businesses should never have private
registrations, can you please answer the following questions so that
those of us who do can have a better understanding of your position?
1. What obstacles do private registration place in front of your efforts?
2. If ICANN disallows private registrations in the gTLDs, how do you
cope with the inevitable rise of agents created to hold private
registrations, completely outside of the ICANN sphere?
Doug
_______________________________________________
mailop mailing list
mailop@mailop.org
https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
