On 06/09/2016 04:33 PM, G. Miliotis wrote: > On 9/6/2016 16:13, Michael Wise via mailop wrote: >> The discussion is on-going. > > This is at least one good thing about this whole deal. I think your > suggestion about deleted items (marked as such somehow) would be a good > compromise. >
While it's better, the junk folder is still the best solution. Do you often search in your deleted folder for something you haven't deleted? > FWIW, personally, I find it all an interesting social mental exercise. > Apparently it's more important for huge mail operators to continue to > exist and grow, rather than keep mail working as everyone expects it to. > I'm seeing big players who have cornered the mail "market" that can't > operate properly cause of their growth and their inability to solve the > scaling problems. I don't see why we NEED to compromise the thing we do, > just cause of the way we currently do it. We, as a society, chose to > support the centralization of these services directly or indirectly. So, > now we simply don't have mail anymore. We have "mostly mail". > Actually, many small operators also silently discard email. Whether it's by incompetence, or voluntarily doesn't matter much. It's just less visible than hotmail.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://chilli.nosignal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mailop
