Which would all make web based chat and apps better than any Mac app currently 
is, especially if you can do neat things like have a live region with apps like 
Adium in the future if VO will support that, saving the need to rely on Growl. 
I think FB chat on the website may end up being the way to chat for many of us 
though.

Cheers
Dave

On 25 Jul 2011, at 15:48, Chris Blouch wrote:

> I think I can fill in some gaps here. I haven't upgraded to Lion yet but I do 
> know about live regions on web pages. This is part of the w3c spec for ARIA 
> or Accessible Rich Internet Applications and has been supported on other 
> browser on other platforms for some time now. Generally it's used for areas 
> on the page which get updated and the web developer wants the screen reader 
> to announce the changes. The common example is a web-based chat where you 
> want it to read any incoming messages added to the chat log. Normally the 
> only way to notice changed content in a particular spot on a page is to move 
> focus away and back or set a hot spot manually. Live region attributes added 
> by the web developer tell the browser to pass changes to the assistive 
> technology to be announced. There are also some settings like only read the 
> changed text and whether to defer to any other stuff already being read. For 
> example, the chat log might be one big container with new items inserted at 
> the end. So when a new item is added we only want the new item read, not the 
> entire chat log. More on the w3c's spec site here:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/terms#def_liveregion
> http://www.w3.org/TR/wai-aria/states_and_properties#attrs_liveregions
> 
> CB
> 
> On 7/23/11 8:20 AM, Krister Ekstrom wrote:
>> Hello.
>> This whole discussion about live regions and the like starts to make me 
>> wonder a bit. What are live regions and what are they supposed to do for us? 
>> I know they are a part of the "area" or how it's spelled thing, but what are 
>> they doing and why would we want them. This doesn't apply only to VO but 
>> also to other screen readers on other platforms that support Area. If a live 
>> region updates a page such that the whole page changes and thus forces the 
>> cursor back to the beginning of a page after each update, do we really want 
>> those areas? What it all boils down to, i guess, is that in VOs case, there 
>> must be a reason for that Live areas check box to be there and checked and 
>> for why they can be unchecked. I would love to know that reason.
>> /Krister
>> 
>> 23 jul 2011 kl. 05:28 skrev Christopher-Mark Gilland:
>> 
>>> It's OK Quinn, don't worry about it.  As you said, we all make mistakes.  
>>> As far as I see it, your apologise greatly is accepted.  I wonder if this 
>>> would solve the issue with my item chooser list.
>>> 
>>> Now you got me curious!
>>> 
>>> Chris.
>>> 
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Quinn Haberl"<quinnhaber...@gmail.com>
>>> To: "MacVisionaries"<macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
>>> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 11:13 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Voice over lag and other lion issues
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thought I would updatethis  quickly. I figured out why safari was
>>> being Soleil D and why I was having so many problems with voice over
>>> in Safari. Why was sitting on my computer I was thinking maybe I
>>> should check the voice over Control Panel thing. I did so and is the
>>> web category in the voice over control panel at the very bottom of the
>>> settings page there is a checkbox that in lion comes checked. This
>>> check boxes called live regions. In a nutshell what it does is it
>>> updates parts of the website that are continually updated for example
>>> ad banners and things like that. I uncheck the checkbox and now
>>> everything seems to be working fine. So unless you really know what
>>> that checkbox does on CheckIt and life will be made much easier at
>>> least it was for me. I didn't mean to be so critical of apple in my
>>> last post. As a matter of fact being a recent Windows convert I have
>>> found that Apple accessibility is amazing. And yes I do agree that we
>>> do need to show some patients on our part. Everyone makes mistakes
>>> it's just hard to deal with those mistakes when voice over and the
>>> other Mac accessibility features are the only way in which you have
>>> access to all your information. I don't mean this to directly
>>> criticize anyone on this blog. I have found the Mac blog very helpful
>>> in solving and answering questions. The criticism is more geared
>>> toward myself as self-criticism.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jul 22, 9:50 pm, "Christopher-Mark Gilland"<clgillan...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> I wouldn't so much say that they are losing commitment, as much as I'd say,
>>>> they seem to be getting very sloppy. I mean, ok, here's my thing. I
>>>> totally am with all you all in saying everyone just chill. the only reason
>>>> I'm keeping my stance so strong on this is the fact that look at this. I
>>>> mean, this looks like we should still be running a beta with all these 
>>>> bugs.
>>>> come on, lookit! We have some beta testers on here, do we not? Admit it,
>>>> did you all see any of these bugs? If not, then wow. I apologize. Really
>>>> I do. I'm then out of lign severely, and for that, I'm ashamed of myself,
>>>> but, really, think about this for justa minute. OK, you all can shoot me, I
>>>> know you may want me to shut up, as does a few people who we won't mention,
>>>> but, if they and all you others will please I beg you, just! for once, hear
>>>> me out for a second.
>>>> 
>>>> If you will, and will at least acknowledge me, then I'll perhaps shut up.
>>>> 
>>>> Just let me have this for a sec.
>>>> 
>>>> Look, let's addres this from a fact stand point rather than a Chris's
>>>> opinion standpoint, ok?
>>>> 
>>>> this way it's more fair.
>>>> 
>>>> 1. We all agree this is a new O S, right?
>>>> 
>>>> 2. We all agree that things are very buggy in many areas, right? Uh dab
>>>> dab dap? Holdit! I'm not done, listen to me! I'm still talking. You'll
>>>> get your chance. I didn't ask you all if th3e problems can be addressed in
>>>> a software update. I'll address that in a second. right now, we're just
>>>> looking at the facts. OK? So I repeat:
>>>> 
>>>> 2. Is it not true, that we all agree that lots of things are buggy? Yes,
>>>> or no.
>>>> 
>>>> 3. Do we all agree that these are problems that should have probably been
>>>> addressed at least to some extent during the beta cycle before the official
>>>> release? Yes or no>?
>>>> 
>>>> 4. Do we all agree that most of these bugs can be delt with and tollerated
>>>> to some degree?
>>>> 
>>>> OK then.
>>>> 
>>>> I think we all agree on all the above, so why such hostility toward me and
>>>> everyone else on list by some members. Look, I feel you all's frustration,
>>>> we just want things to work, but we also are getting frustrated at the
>>>> nonconstructive messages cluttering the inbox of many. But, there is a
>>>> delete key, and I assure you, things will die down once Lion is more
>>>> progressed. Right now, everyone is just kind of in that what the bird state
>>>> right now.
>>>> 
>>>> do we need to chill? OK, maybe so, but, really people, do you really think
>>>> that an O S should be this buggy before official release? I know you all
>>>> don't like hearing what I'm saying, and it's pissing you all off hearing 
>>>> it,
>>>> but that's because I am not afraid to speak my mind nor the truth. The
>>>> blunt truth is, at least in my view of things, Apple is beginning to fail
>>>> miserably at there line of duty with accessibilty. Now, does this mean I'm
>>>> saying that they are purposefully? doing this? No! Mark it in red what I
>>>> say here: Ab, suh, lootly? not! I think they're just becoming more and
>>>> more lazy, maybe not wanting to be so involved. Maybe they're trying to
>>>> take on too much at once. I, don't, know! I don't know what goes on behind
>>>> the scenes there? I probably don't, wanna? know! The point is, we really
>>>> can't make accusations, can we! We don't know if they're really working
>>>> behind the scene or not. So, on the one hand, should we probably just
>>>> chill? Yes, but, having said that, is it mortally wrong for me to
>>>> constructively complain about observations I've found? Yes. Is it
>>>> justifiable to say negative things about bugs I find which we all knkow
>>>> exist? Yes! It's just an observation/opinion people? It's not your spouce
>>>> who won't... umm... I'm not finishing that... LOL! ROFL!
>>>> 
>>>> You get the point.
>>>> 
>>>> So in my defense, I ask jpeole, please be more gentle with me. I'm only
>>>> trying to help you all, and make suggestions. I may come on harsh at times,
>>>> I know I do, but for god sake, cut me some slack! I'm frustrated! Can you
>>>> blame me? Are we not all at one point or another in life? Bluntly? Deal
>>>> with it, or don't read my mail! It's not rocket science!
>>>> 
>>>> OK, I'm not gonna keep ranting and raving about htis. I've said my peace 
>>>> and
>>>> hopefully've been heard. Enough is enough, in all respect fiarness to all
>>>> of you all. I rest my case.
>>>> 
>>>> Chris.
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to