but it is still a goof idea to get a case. It helps distungish yoru iphone from 
someone elses. lol!

S
On Jul 13, 2010, at 6:38 PM, Buddy Brannan wrote:

> Hey Brian,
> 
> I'm told by an Apple guy that, while the iPhone is made of glass, it's not 
> your ordinary garden variety glass, but the glass like the kind of glass in 
> helicopter windshields. I don't think that will shatter with normal handling 
> and dropping and things. 
> --
> Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA
> Phone: (814) 860-3194 or 888-75-BUDDY
> 
> 
> 
> On Jul 13, 2010, at 7:23 PM, Bryan Smart wrote:
> 
>> Well, I have an iPhone 4, am a left-handed person, and haven't had any 
>> problems.
>> 
>> Of course, I'm using an extremely thin hard plastic slip-case to protect my 
>> $700, mostly glass, phone, as just about anyone reasonable would that 
>> doesn't have a bottomless bank account. Yes, it looks nice, all glass and 
>> stainless steel. It isn't real durable that way. I'd like something else, 
>> but I like what it can do more than I dislike how it is made. And, besides, 
>> I can fix its construction issues with a case. It's kind of like, do what 
>> you gotta do to make the tech work for you, or else chill out on Symbian or 
>> Windows Mobile, where the accessible apps are few and those OSes are 
>> dropping accessibility support in about a year. As a blind guy, I can do so 
>> much more with my iPhone than I could with any of my Nokias, so I can 
>> overlook a flaw, particularly if it doesn't affect me.
>> 
>> I know that, if you hold it just in the right way, without the case on, that 
>> you can cause the signal strength to reduce. I could do that with my Nokia 
>> E71, though, so don't know why it is such a big deal that it happens on 
>> iPhone.
>> 
>> If you don't like the iPhone, then more power to what ever choice suits you. 
>> If you like the idea of the iPhone, then, I suggest that you go and try one 
>> out for yourself. Most places will let you do a 30 day return if you're not 
>> satisfied. You might find out that the majorly hyped supposed problems 
>> aren't a problem for you, either. Since I haven't seen stories about people 
>> returning their iPhones in droves, I'd say that there are about 2,000,000 
>> people by now that agree with me.
>> 
>> Bryan
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com 
>> [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Simon F
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 3:56 AM
>> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: RE: A warning about Digit-Eyes
>> 
>> Yeah apple have done great things, that's why they don't appear to be 
>> correcting The issue with the loss of signal on the iPhone 4, when it's is 
>> held in a left hand and the signal is lost.
>> 
>> When they fix this issue, they'll sell a lot more. 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>> [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Doug Lawlor
>> Sent: Tuesday, 13 July 2010 4:15 p.m.
>> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>> Subject: Re: A warning about Digit-Eyes
>> 
>> Maybe an RFID reader will come in the next iPhone or some other idevice. I 
>> think it is just amazing what Apple has done with these devices thus far. I 
>> personally would like to see some sort of haptic feedback so we can get a 
>> tactual sense of icons and controls. I know Apple is working on this.
>> Patents have been filed by Apple regarding methods for haptic feedback. 
>> 
>> Doug
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> On 2010-07-12, at 5:40 PM, Scott Howell <scottn3...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Doug, I think this was something APple had explored and may eventually 
>>> do. Apple has all sorts of ideas floating about. :) On Jul 12, 2010, 
>>> at
>> 2:18 PM, Doug Lawlor wrote:
>>> 
>>>> No RFID reader in iPhone 4 as far as I can tell. My knowledge is 
>>>> limited
>> on this subject as well. It may depend on the scanner being used. 
>>>> 
>>>> Doug
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> 
>>>> On 2010-07-12, at 6:44 AM, Scott Howell <scottn3...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hey Doug,
>>>>> 
>>>>> We are probably straying a bit off topic for the list, but to answer
>> your question, I really do not know. It may be for capturing information 
>> about a specific product, you would have to get pretty close. The distances 
>> you refer too is more useful for warehouses, dockyards, and such. I am not 
>> sure if the ability to read is based on the scanner or the RFID tag itself.
>> So, I think you can pretty much figure my knowledge is quite limited, other 
>> than what I read. I do not know when Apple might put these readers in the 
>> phone, but I thought it was to be included in version 4, but that I believe 
>> did not happen yet.
>>>>> On Jul 11, 2010, at 10:10 PM, Doug Lawlor wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> That's interesting, RFID would be much better for identifying 
>>>>>> products
>> because you would not have to point a device at the product in question to 
>> identify it. Just get a reader in the general direztion of the of the 
>> product and we should be able to identify it. As I understand it, the range 
>> of RFID is quite large, something in the range of 30 feet. How do we 
>> determine a product when we have a number of products in one area, a covert 
>> full of cans and bottles, each presenting a signal that has a 30 foot 
>> radius? 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Doug
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 2010-07-11, at 9:33 PM, Scott Howell <scottn3...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Doug,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I do not know how many products have them now, but I suspect more 
>>>>>>> than
>> we know. For example, I recently learned that the recycle bins our county 
>> provides us has a RFID chip imbedded in them. Apparently the data collected 
>> from the chips let's the county know how often we put the bins out. RFID 
>> chips are being used more now because of the speed and ability to collect 
>> data on products being shipped and received, etc.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to