I agree. Apple truly does make productivity a pleasure!
Olivia
On Apr 15, 2010, at 4:47 AM, Nicolai Svendsen wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> *grins* Sure do. I've got a coffee thermos next to me in my classroom. I'm 
> supposed to be diligently taking notes, but really, I'm writing blog posts, 
> tweeting, on seven messaging accounts, and browsing the web while taking 
> notes.
> 
> That said, James has a point here. NFB did retract their statement, although 
> their statement still was really bias. It said they wanted to open it up for 
> dialog, yet they continue to trash Apple in the same post.
> 
> It just saddens me why this has to happen. I love what Apple has done, and I 
> know they'll keep it up. I've never sent so many text messages from my 
> iPhone, never enjoyed a computer this much as a Mac, and had this much fun. 
> That's because I don't have to worry about any third-party installed screen 
> reading access software crashing, not starting up, giving me script errors, 
> and so-on.
> 
> I've really found the accessibility team, regardless of my issue, extremely 
> responsive. The longest time I have waited for a reply to either a 
> suggestion, comment or issue is a full day. Not longer than that. They've 
> replied to all my e-mails except one, and I have sent quite a few of them. 
> But despite that, the feature I asked for was implemented.
> 
> Regards,
> Nic
> Skype: Kvalme
> MSN Messenger: nico...@home3.gvdnet.dk
> AIM: cincinster
> yahoo Messenger: cin368
> Facebook Profile
> My Twitter
> 
> On Apr 15, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Cody wrote:
> 
>> Is laughing
>> 
>> We got early morning coffee drinkers I see, this list is really jumpin
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob" <rmlambert1...@gmail.com>
>> To: <macvisionaries@googlegroups.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 4:27 AM
>> Subject: Re: What do you think?
>> 
>> 
>>> I saw they did and was surprised, and happy, to see that.
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPod
>>> 
>>> On Apr 15, 2010, at 1:22 AM, "James & Nash" <james.austin1...@googlemail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Although i've already posted on this, I just wanted to add that  despite 
>>>> the criticism that has been levelled at NFB - and rightly,  they have 
>>>> commended Apple's commitment to accesibility on the IPad.
>>>> TC
>>>> James, Lyn, Nash & Twinny
>>>> On 15 Apr 2010, at 09:16, Rob wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Thank you for your input, Nic. Much appreciated. :)
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sent from my iPod
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Apr 15, 2010, at 1:12 AM, Charlie Doremus  <giantdolp...@gmail.com> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> I would also like to thank you, Nic, for saving my bacon. Like  Anne I 
>>>>>> was going to take issue with NFB and others who love to  gripe for the 
>>>>>> sake of griping. You saved me from being called  tactless twice in the 
>>>>>> same week. Even though I don't use Jaws the  idea of uninstall, install, 
>>>>>> uninstall, install, no matter what  program, gives me the creeps.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sent from the iPad I wish I had
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Apr 14, 2010, at 9:30 PM, Anne Robertson <a...@anarchie.org.uk> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hello Nic,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thank you for this post. You've just saved me from going on a  major 
>>>>>>> rant along the same lines.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Anne
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Apr 15, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Nicolai Svendsen wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I seriously doubt that is the case. Apple accessibility has been 
>>>>>>>> around for six years now, not three. I doubt NFB had anything to  do 
>>>>>>>> with it. Apple is going to keep it up because they are  committed. The 
>>>>>>>> article about the lawsuit doesn't actually  mention Apple much.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> There is actually a very good point of view. Apple poses a  threat to 
>>>>>>>> the NFB of taking over the technical market. This is  why NFB did not 
>>>>>>>> sue Skype, but Apple. Agreement or not, I'm  pretty sure they listened 
>>>>>>>> to users using Outspoken and such,  rather than an organization that 
>>>>>>>> can't even review the product  properly when it is out. Apple has done 
>>>>>>>> far more than anyone for  accessibility improvements. Apple said they 
>>>>>>>> had something in  store, and they sure did. I of course realize that 
>>>>>>>> it is a  pretty serious statement. Of course, I am not particularly a 
>>>>>>>> fan  of the NFB at all. Saying that, NFB has made some seriously  
>>>>>>>> inaccurate statements as well, far outweighing mine. NFB  actually has 
>>>>>>>> no reason to sue Apple. What would they sue them  for, exactly? 
>>>>>>>> Because their products are accessible, and they  want everyone to pay 
>>>>>>>> more than what a Macbook costs for  assistive technology? That 
>>>>>>>> wouldn't actually surprise me much.  It's all about competition. If 
>>>>>>>> they think they're about to be kicked out, of course they would 
>>>>>>>> consider Apple a threat.  Because Apple has done something Microsoft 
>>>>>>>> has not. All these  things sound really twisted and disgusting to me.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Apple can hardly be sued for their effort. Their lawsuit had to  do 
>>>>>>>> with iTunes on the Windows side. Fair enough, but that is a  pretty 
>>>>>>>> ridiculous suit if it really is based on accessibility.  That is not 
>>>>>>>> the case, however, as there are plenty of other  useful programs for 
>>>>>>>> PCs that are not anywhere near as accessible  as iTunes 9. And NFB 
>>>>>>>> doesn't care about that. Which, again,  leads me to believe that, 
>>>>>>>> because NFB is scared of being kicked  out, they do everything they 
>>>>>>>> can to stop people buying their  product. That would make sense.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Windows users rely on scripts all the time to use any  application. I 
>>>>>>>> suggest you look through your jAWS folder to see  what I mean. Have 
>>>>>>>> you even seen just the download size of a JAWS  installation? It's 
>>>>>>>> outrageous. People who moan about iTunes not  being accessible just 
>>>>>>>> because the interface accidentally broke,  just need to use scripts 
>>>>>>>> like they do for everything else. I'm  surprised that wasn't their 
>>>>>>>> first complaint. JAWS, or just  Windows in general, isn't even that 
>>>>>>>> stable. If JAWS crashes,  it's stupidly difficult most of the time to 
>>>>>>>> reload the product.  Even if you manage to do so, you will probably 
>>>>>>>> run into the  screen not being read correctly when reading list boxes 
>>>>>>>> or with  the cursor. Or, the worst-case scenario. You have to 
>>>>>>>> uninstall  JAWS 11 after attempting to install Video Intercept, 
>>>>>>>> reinstall  JAWS 10, install VIdeo Intercept, uninstall JAWS 10 then 
>>>>>>>> reinstall JAWS 11.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Maybe I'm slamming the NFB a bit, but really, they need a kick  in the 
>>>>>>>> ass. I'm just happy the Danish blindness organizations  are not this 
>>>>>>>> corrupt and twisted, and they actually review  fairly and take a 
>>>>>>>> proper look at what a company offers before  suing them. I'll always 
>>>>>>>> be negative about the NFB, though I am  actually being neutral when 
>>>>>>>> talking about the actual lawsuit  itself.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Say what you want to, it won't change my mind. Even if it is  someone 
>>>>>>>> from NFB saying it. Some NFB people are great. Some do  incredibly 
>>>>>>>> good reviews. Some don't. And in whole, I think the  organization just 
>>>>>>>> sucks for filing unnecessary lawsuits for  nothing. Maybe I'm going on 
>>>>>>>> a childish tantrum here, perhaps.  But once in a while, you need to. A 
>>>>>>>> company is trying to provide  great accessibility for their products, 
>>>>>>>> and they are sued  because of one problem. iTunes is actually still 
>>>>>>>> useful on the  Windows side, people. Quit your darn nitpicking.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Nic
>>>>>>>> Skype: Kvalme
>>>>>>>> MSN Messenger: nico...@home3.gvdnet.dk
>>>>>>>> AIM: cincinster
>>>>>>>> yahoo Messenger: cin368
>>>>>>>> Facebook Profile
>>>>>>>> My Twitter
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Apr 15, 2010, at 8:08 AM, Rob Lambert wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I just got wind, from a friend of mine, that the only reason  Apple 
>>>>>>>>> is accessible to us is because of a lawsuit by the NFB.  The term of 
>>>>>>>>> the agreement was for accessibility improvements  for three years. 
>>>>>>>>> Here's a question. First, what's your side of  this ordeal? Second, 
>>>>>>>>> who thinks Apple will keep up with the  accessibility improvements 
>>>>>>>>> after this three year term is up? I  apologize for making smooth 
>>>>>>>>> waters mirky, I just wanted to know  what your take on this was.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the  Google 
>>>>>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com .
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com .
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en .
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the  Google 
>>>>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com .
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com .
>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en .
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the  Google 
>>>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com .
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com .
>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en .
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to  macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com .
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en .
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com .
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en .
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com .
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en .
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to