This is my point exactly.  Know one knows.  lol.  I wouldn't be shocked if they 
did make some changes to the hardware.  They usually do.  Changes to the 
hardware.  like, Faster processor, more storage memory( which is almost a 
given), better camera, maybe a flash.  We all know what the 3GS is all about 
and well I just don't see the point in buying something that will be eclipsed 
in 4 months at the most.
On Mar 28, 2010, at 7:50 AM, James & Nash wrote:

> Hi Ricardo
> 
>> Why get an iPhone now when a new one will become in out in like 3 months?
> 
> Has the IPhone ben completely overhauled in v. 4.0? I was under the 
> impression that the model was the same, and that it was only the software 
> that is being upgraded.
> 
> TC
> James, Lyn, Nash & Twinny
> On 28 Mar 2010, at 12:04, Ricardo Walker wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Why get an iPhone now when a new one will become in out in like 3 months?
>> On Mar 27, 2010, at 7:13 PM, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>> 
>>> I just ordered an IPhone 3gs and what decided me finally was hearing a 
>>> podcast about android accessibility on the Blindcooltech feed.  The two big 
>>> advantages the IPhone 3gs has over Android and this is as of March 27, 2010 
>>> are that both email and browsing are accessible.  Those two parts of 
>>> Android still aren't accessible.  What blind people will get that buy 
>>> Android is the same accessibility that was available on the LG3600 phone 
>>> when that became available.  But that's why me and verizon parted company 
>>> all those years ago and I'm still happy that split happened!On Tue, 21 Jul 
>>> 2009, Josh de Lioncourt wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> It's quite possible to use the iPHone one handed. I do this frequently
>>>> while walking around. It's, of course, easier to use two hands when
>>>> you can, but that's true with any mobile phone. Anyway, there's no
>>>> problem using the iPhone one handed, and it isn't all that much
>>>> different from using any other phone that way. :)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Josh de Lioncourt
>>>>    ?my other mail provider is an owl?
>>>> 
>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/Lioncourt
>>>> Music: http://stage19music.com
>>>> Mac-cessibility: http://www.Lioncourt.com
>>>> Blog: http://lioncourtsmusings.blogspot.com
>>>> GoodReads: http://goodreads.com/Lioncourt
>>>> 
>>>> On Jul 21, 2009, at 2:03 AM, Simon Fogarty wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Using it on the go I mean, while I?m walking around.
>>>>> 
>>>>> With the n82 and other nokia phones I can do this, either on a call
>>>>> or typing / reading email or text messages, I can do this with one
>>>>> hand, which I don?t think I could dowith the IPhone.
>>>>> 
>>>>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com 
>>>>> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>>> ] On Behalf Of patrickneazer
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, 21 July 2009 6:34 a.m.
>>>>> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>>> Subject: Re: IPhone accessibility
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hello Simon and all:
>>>>> 
>>>>> I want to ask you what you mean by using it on the go. I am asking
>>>>> because unless there is something I am missing ... and there may
>>>>> be ... the iphone is quite usable. That does not mean you have to
>>>>> use it ... it just means that your usability concerns may be
>>>>> misplaced.
>>>>> On Jul 20, 2009, at 5:13 AM, Simon Fogarty wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks yes I understand all your pro?s and cons.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Yeah I?ve got msp from a windows mobile device that I gave up
>>>>> around a year ago. And now use talks on my n82.
>>>>> It?s  a number of different things that  I?m hesitating over, such
>>>>> as size and useability  while on the go that are some of the things
>>>>> that are important.
>>>>> The n82   I can use on the go the IPhone I?m guessing I wont be
>>>>> able to.
>>>>> 
>>>>> But still a few other thigns to think about before the buy or not!
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com 
>>>>> [mailto:macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>>> ] On Behalf Of patrickneazer
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, 19 July 2009 10:34 p.m.
>>>>> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>>> Subject: Re: IPhone accessibility
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hello Simon and all:
>>>>> 
>>>>> One question you might want to consider is the issue of
>>>>> expandability. I am a user of a nokia 6650 with Mobile Speak and I
>>>>> love it. However, the number of applications that will work with it
>>>>> is not as robust as the Iphone. Second, while both my Mobile Speak
>>>>> and voiceover upgrades are free, the method of upgrading is quite
>>>>> different. I do not know about talks because I have never used it.
>>>>> However, if it is anything like Mobile Speak I cannot upgrade it
>>>>> independently. The only reason I make a point of this is the ability
>>>>> of being able to keep up with the latest updates to a system rather
>>>>> than being one step behind. Furthermore, does it make sense to have
>>>>> to pay a transfer cost if you either lose your phone or decide you
>>>>> want or need a new one. In the case of Mobile Speak, if you change
>>>>> phones for whatever reason there is a transfer cost. I do not know
>>>>> how it works with Talks. If I want another Iphone I just get another
>>>>> Iphone without incurring any additional costs for things beyond my
>>>>> control which may have resulted in the phone's loss or just for the
>>>>> freedom of wanting something different.
>>>>> 
>>>>> There are a few more reasons I can mention though I will point out
>>>>> only one more ... with this arrangement of the Iphone and AT&T, the
>>>>> entire customer service flow is for the first time under one roof.
>>>>> If I have a problem with the Iphone I am able to take it to AT&T and
>>>>> they can be of assistance without necessarily farming it out to
>>>>> someone else and if they do farm it out to someone else ... that
>>>>> would be Apple and they would know that I am on the way (smile).
>>>>> With Mobile Speak it could be a mobile speak issue which I would
>>>>> have to go to Code Factory, it could be a phone problem where Nokia
>>>>> would have to be called in, it could be a billing problem where the
>>>>> Phone company would have to be tapped and, if I had a problem with
>>>>> the actual purchase of Mobile Speak and I did not purchase it from
>>>>> Code Factory I then would have to deal with AT&T's office of
>>>>> national disability concerns which is a completely separate
>>>>> operation from AT&T. I like the one umbrella that the Iphone has the
>>>>> potential to provide. I have both and love both and see the
>>>>> advantages to each.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Just my two cents contributed to the discussion. No matter what your
>>>>> final conclusion, it will be a good one.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Take good care.
>>>>> On Jul 19, 2009, at 4:35 AM, Simon Fogarty wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Yeah, I had a sit down and play with the I phone for about an hour
>>>>> today and
>>>>> I gotta admit, the biggest problem is familiarity.
>>>>> I'm so use to the Nokia and talks interface that the IPhones system
>>>>> is not
>>>>> as efficient  yet as I would have hoped.
>>>>> 
>>>>> However I gotta admit that I am thinking of reasons why I shouldn't
>>>>> change
>>>>> to one at this point,  and the only reason so far is that my n82 does
>>>>> everything that the iphone does and that I need it to.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>>> [mailto:macvisionar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of kaare dehard
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, 19 July 2009 7:29 a.m.
>>>>> To: macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>>> Subject: Re: IPhone accessibility
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Honestly given what I have heard/read, because this interface is so
>>>>> very different from what we have grown accustomed to, it's probably
>>>>> tough to get fixed on it right away. it's probably a let's forget
>>>>> about the old wisdom or at least set it aside while looking in to this
>>>>> and start from the ground. So, in a nutshell this is more like a slow
>>>>> growth to understanding product rather than something that can be
>>>>> quickly affixed.
>>>>> On 18-Jul-09, at 7:10 AM, Simon Fogarty wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Just wondering how many of you that are now using the Ipone 3gs, are
>>>>> totally blind rather than the partially / Visually impaired users.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The device to me sounds more like it's for a VI person than a
>>>>> totally blind
>>>>> person.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm total  and I'm trying to compare this for useage / accessibility
>>>>> against
>>>>> my Nokia s60 device.
>>>>> And as I've only had a very quick play with the IPhone 3gs I can't
>>>>> say I'm
>>>>> fixed on it yet.
>>>>> And I'm keen to hear how the totally blind users are getting on with
>>>>> it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> 
>>>>> Simonf.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Take good care and I wish you enough.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Love
>>>>> 
>>>>> Me
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Take good care and I wish you enough.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Love
>>>>> 
>>>>> Me
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionaries@googlegroups.com
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en
>>>> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "MacVisionaries" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
>> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "MacVisionaries" group.
> To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MacVisionaries" group.
To post to this group, send email to macvisionar...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
macvisionaries+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/macvisionaries?hl=en.

Reply via email to